GlobeMedx Talk: Museums and Social Justice

This weekend is the GlobeMed Summit. I was invited to give a short presentation on my work in the museum field. Here are my slides and a copy of what I have to say!

I do audience research and evaluation for museums on issues of inclusion. I’ll explain the details of what that means in a little bit, but suffice it to say that it’s a weird, but completely awesome job I had no idea existed, until I was working it.

I have always been drawn to the museum world on a deep emotional level. I love their ability to bring together people from different backgrounds, make complicated ideas physical and immediate, and make people excited to explore the world around them. But while exploring different career goals in college, I went through a period where I thought, despite my love, that museums weren’t important enough. I thought because they weren’t serving an immediate human need that they were not aligned with social justice values.

I struggled with the question, “Do museums do social justice work?” After working in the field for 4 years, I can confidently say… Sometimes.

If we define social justice work in terms of its ability to disrupt systems of power that place more value over certain lives than others, museums do not always create positive impact and can, in fact, reproduce social disadvantages by marginalizing certain people’s experience and making people feel as if these public institutions are not for them.

So, what is the worst case scenario museum?

  • full of affluent, people with advanced degrees learning about things dead white men discovered, created, or looted from other countries during the colonial era
  • not responsive to the needs of their surrounding communities and don’t question their relevance
  •  not physically, culturally, or economically accessible

To their credit, museums have evolved a lot in the past decades. Here is a quick history:

  • Object-Centered: Museums as we know them today were created to protect and display objects of importance to our cultural heritage. Their primary responsibility was to the donors of objects and their attitude could be characterized as “Be grateful you get to look at our stuff.”
  • Education-Centered: After WWII museums began rethinking their relevance the public and became primarily education-driven.  While this was a huge step forward, their resources were only accessible to an educated elite and curators held more power than visitors.
  • Visitor-Centered: Since the 90s, many museums began to critically rethink their relationship, not only with their visitors, but with the public at large. They began to realize that who’s NOT coming to their museum is just as important as who IS and that their value as education centers is only worthwhile if they are accessible in every sense of the word. Power to the people.

Which brings me to this lovely quote describing the growth of community-driven museums in rural Brazil:

For the moment, in my country, [museums] are being used in a new way, as tools for self-expression, self-recognition and representation; as spaces of power negotiation among social forces; and as strategies for empowering people so that they are more able to decide their own destiny.
— Maria de Lourdes Huerta

So all of this begets the question, “what is my job exactly?”

I conduct qualitative research for museums responding to the challenges of becoming more visitor-centered and inclusive. We do 2 types of research. The first, evaluation, helps museums measure the impact of program and exhibits. The second type, audience research, helps museums understand the needs of communities they want to engage, so they can develop new experiences.

The methods we use are nothing radical. It’s a lot of observation, ethnography, interviews, focus groups, and surveys, but the insights we provide enable museums to realize their potential to organize communities, promote tolerance and awareness, and inspire people to action.

In the past years, I’ve had the opportunity to: 

  • measure a science center’s success engaging visitors from its neighboring zipcodes
  • help an art museum present the work of a contemporary Iranian artist with sensitivity to issues of representation for the Muslim community
  • investigate how intergenerational bilingual families use bilingual museums labels
  • help a natural history museum create a vision for how its Asia exhibits could be redesigned for increased relevance/sensitivity to contemporary Asian visitors.

It’s been a privilege to work with museums that are asking such thoughtful questions, but I’ve been longing to use this type of research not just to make recommendations, but produce physical outcomes. So I’m going back school for industrial design next year. Ultimately, I hope to further these ideas doing participatory design for public spaces. I’m excited to see what the future.  

Reflecting on Self-Five's

Yesterday I had the great fortune of being accepted into my top choice grad school. The program will not begin for another 10 months, but I could not be more excited about where I'm heading, the types of ideas I will get to explore over the next few years, and the type of career it will afford me in the future.  

We rarely get giant neon signs that tell us to take a moment and take pride in our own accomplishments. It's not unusual for 20-somethings to feel chronically discontent with their situation, but I want to take this opportunity to appreciate the calm and reflect on what it took to get here. 

I officially decided to apply to Industrial Design programs about 18 months ago. I almost made an earlier exit into humanities/social science programs, but turned away when I realized that fear of being unable to compete with applicants from undergrad design programs was the main factor keeping me from what I really wanted out of grad school. Most of all, I seriously doubted I would be able to pull together a solid design portfolio, when all I had was research work and a scattering of DIY projects. But from that moment on, every ounce of my free time was devoted towards building the skills necessary to not only get accepted, but do well in an ID program. I took classes in drawing and woodworking, self-taught basic Adobe CC skills, and started working on portfolio projects I could build through completion. 

Putting together a visual portfolio as a non-designer was, by far, the most difficult intellectual work I've ever done. Periods of being overwhelmed with self-doubt were followed by rewarding highs of solving problems and producing something objectively good. I sought advice from anyone I could, worked entire weekends on things that were ultimately useless, and spent weeks going straight from my job to another 8-10 hours of portfolio work as deadlines came closer. My friends and family certainly felt the strain as well, as there were several months where "portfolio talk" accounted for 95% of my active mind...  All the work felt worth it though, when I was able to submit a portfolio of which I was truly, deeply proud.

Submitting was such a relief because I knew I had done my best work, but the abstract nature of a creative portfolio made it difficult to gauge my chances or evaluate myself objectively. Which is why after 2 months of waiting, and compulsively checking thegradcafe.com, I am so pleased I can finally bask in the sweet, sweet glow of accomplishing something I didn't think possible, because I worked as hard as I possibly could. 

There's a lot I still want to improve on before I start classes, but for the time being I want to appreciate this momentous accomplishment and do some self-five's.

Special thanks to my extensive editorial/emotional support network, including, but not limited to: my amazing/supportive parents and sister (esp. Mom for her numerous rounds of editing), my bosses Cecilia and Jane, Sami, John Kelly, Shanika, Christina, Sarah, Rose, Sloane, Matt, Annie Wu, and every other person who gave advice or let me talk about my portfolio ad nauseam.   

I'm so excited!

How can we make museum artifacts more like dogs? On @Ninaksimon and participation

I've been a big fan of Nina Simon since reading her book, The Participatory Museum (read it for free online!) It had a big impact on how I envisioned the possibilities for museums as social spaces. If you're interested in anything pertaining to public participation, cultural organizations, and community dialogue, you definitely should read her book. But if not, this TED Talk is a great, 15-minute distillation of a lot of the ideas she promotes. 

A friend from the Smithsonian said, “I know a lot of people who work at art museums who would recoil in horror at being inundated with ‘Sunday Painters.’” But if people who paint on Sundays are not the core audience for an art museum, I don’t know who is!
— Nina Simon

Some of my favorite thoughts:

  • Don't dismiss participatory opportunities because you've seen it fail. When you show people you value their thoughts by giving them beautiful or interesting tools, they will respond in kind. Meaningful design translates to meaningful responses. 
  • Emphasizing participation does not mean objects aren't important. Museum objects can be powerful social catalysts. She cites the example of dogs, who can inspire conversations and connections between strangers. Leading to the HCW challenge...
How can we make museum artifacts more like dogs? How can we make them into opportunities for conversations that otherwise wouldn’t happen?
— Nina Simon

I love #MuseumSelfie day, and I don't care who knows it

#MuseumSelfie Day invites visitors, staff (even animals and objects themselves) to post selfies from museums around the world. 

#MuseumCat

#MuseumCat

Selfies have never been a universally appreciated medium, but this fauxliday in particular has become a polarizing force in the museum world. You either think selfies are a scourge or a fun expressive tool. 

While many conscientious selfie objectors do so on the basis of vanity*, I think this boils down to a general debate on meaning-making in museums. Cultural conservatives** would define experiences with art through the traditional lens of art history, while other voices argue that the interpretation of art should be more personal and subjective.   

There is inherent value to all points of view and backgrounds. Every person has the right to equal access to aesthetic encounters with art and to museums in a meaningful and independent way.
— Patricia Lannes, Director of CALTA 21

I'm a fully biased visitor experience advocate and not an art historian, but like the proverbial tree falling in an empty woods, I think art is given meaning by its reception. People encounter art and historical objects with a wide range of personal knowledge and associations. Exploring the artists' intentions, historical context, and technique, etc. provide layers to enrich an understanding of a piece, but if someone has a genuine emotional response to something that clashes with those facts, it does not make their response invalid. 

At the end of the day, selfies foster personal connections with museum collections and get people sharing their experience with social networks. And I'd say that's worth a few blurry duck-faces.  

Enjoy the twitter feed : )


*In which case, do you really think these people did this to look attractive?

** Conservative like "seeks to preserve things as they are, emphasizing stability and continuity" not like this